HomeMy WebLinkAbout1204 Approving Specifications 41st Street West and Helena Road ProjectBILL NO. 2013-027 ORDINANCE NO. 1aQq
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE KNOWN AS THE
41 STREET WEST AND HELENA ROAD PROJECT
WHEREAS, there is an opportunity for a new manufacturing facility to be located in the
area known as Riverside Horizons; and
WHEREAS, the opportunity involves the construction of a facility that is over 250,000
square feet, with an anticipated total capital investment of over $40 million within the next two
years and the creation of over 250 full -time permanent jobs; and
WHEREAS, certain infrastructure will have to be constructed to serve this project, as
well as other future projects, to be located adjacent to the proposed site of the current
opportunity; and
WHEREAS, the initial infrastructure project specifications that require Board approval
for what will be known as the 41 Street West and Helena Road Project is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Attachment A; and
WHEREAS, the construction of this additional public infrastructure by the City fulfills a
public purpose and will further the growth of the City, facilitate the development of the entire
Horizons site, improve the environment of the City, foster increased economic activity within the
City, increase employment opportunities within the City, and otherwise be in the best interests of
the City by furthering the health, safety and welfare of its residents and taxpayers; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City, in order to further the objectives of the
industrial and economic development of the City, for the Board to approve the attached
specifications for public infrastructure construction for the 41 Street West and Helena Road
Project, and authorize the City Administrator to seek competitive bids pursuant to the City Code,
including, but not limited to, Chapter 135.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF
THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE, MISSOURI AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY. It is in the best interest of the City,
in order to further the objectives of industrial and economic development of the City, to approve
the attached specifications as amended for public infrastructure construction for the 41 Street
West and Helena Road Project, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, and further
authorize the City Administrator to seek competitive bids pursuant to the City Code, including
but not limited to Chapter 135.
WA 4191187.1
SECTION 2. AUTHORITY GRANTED. The Mayor, City Administrator, Special
Counsel to the City - Spencer Fane Britt & Browne LLP, and other appropriate officials and
employees of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take such further action related
thereto as is otherwise necessary or desirable to carry out and comply with the intent of this
Ordinance.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage and approval.
BE IT REMEMBERED that the above was read two times by heading only, PASSED
AND APPROVED by a majority of the Board of Aldermen and APPROVED by the Mayor of
the City of Riverside, Missouri, this/Zay of April, 2013.
, k" "� 'e 1:L
Teen L. Rose, Mayor
ATTEST: "
Robin Littrell," ity
Approved as to form:
)
pencer ane Brk ABrowne LLP,
Special Clounsel to We City
by Michael McKinley
WA 4191187.1
NOTICE TO BIDDERS
RE: Specifications and Construction Plans for the 41 Street and Helena Road Improvement Project
The City's Consulting Engineering — HDR Engineering, Inc. — is authorized to approve such plan and
specification revisions as it deems appropriate in its professional judgment to resolve the pending issues
as described in its April 16, 2013, correspondence to the City, a copy of which is attached. An addendum
will be issued upon resolution of the pending issues.
April 16, 2013
Michael Duffy, Director of Community Development
City of Riverside, Missouri
2950 NW Vivion Road
Riverside, MO 64150
Re: 41 Street— Mattox Road to Helena Road
Helena Road — 43 Street to 41 Street
Dear Mr. Duffy,
HDR staff has reviewed the provided Specifications and revised Construction Plans
prepared by Renaissance Infrastructure Consulting dated April 15, 2013 for the
referenced project. Below are our revised comments.
Division 1 General Requirements
2130 EARTHWORK
Paragraph l.a. references topsoil stripping to be incidental to the bid item "Common
Excavation ". There is no such bid item listed. Are you referencing "Unclassified Excavation "?
02400 SEEDING, SODDING
Paragraph l.a. Reference is made to APWA Section 2400 Mix #1. APWA has a Type A and a Type
B seeding mix. Are you referring to Type A?
Sheet 2 of 21
The pipe design table for Line "H" refers to a 72" diameter outlet pipe. The plans have been
revised to dual 36" pipes on Sheet 13. The rating curve for a single 72" outlet pipe from the
detention basin is not equivalent to a rating curve for the dual 36" pipes. Please submit
detention basin calculations for review.
Sheet 13 of 21
�+ Original Comment: 2. "Open Top Structure" H2, what does this mean? Will there be an 8'x 5'
box, 6' deep with no lid or grate? This is not a standard APWA structure; detail will be needed
within the plan set.
RIC Response: Per our conversations with the City, this is the solution agreed upon. A detail
has been added to the plans.
Additional comment: Check box size, 8'x5' does not appear to be big enough. What is the
proposed separation between the 36" pipes to provide adequate space for compaction?
Ball Ealiaaariq, Inc. 4435 Main Street Phone: 18161360.2708
Suite 1008 Fw: 181613681777
Kansas City. MO 64111 -18% w hdrinc.can
Considering wall thickness of the RCP's a larger structure may be necessary. Regardless, per
KCAPWA Detail JB -1, structures larger than 7' in width require special structural detail.
Original Comment: 3. Line H will be problematic. It will sit full of water in normal conditions and
continually fill with debris and sediment plugging the "down stream" outlet. This will create a
maintenance problem. Consider other alternatives including open channel above the existing
gas line.
RIC response: Per our conversations with the City, this is the solution agreed upon.
Additional comment: What occurs when the pipe and /or structure clogs? Are there any
structures upstream that will be susceptible to flooding? What are the minimum building
opening elevations in relationship to the overflow path? Provide an emergency spillway to
convey the 100 year storm in the event the system is clogged.
For ease of future maintenance provide a level working platform adjacent to the structure and
an access path to the structure suitable for a rubber tire backhoe.
Revise the hand rail /trash rack detail to be removable for ease of maintenance. Per the detail, is
the wall thickness of 6" and steel placement adequate to accommodate the proposed 2"
galvanized steel pipe?
If these comments are addressed HDR would support City approval of the design plans. These
revisions could be made either pre- advertisement or by addendum. Let me know if you have
any questions regarding these comments.
Sincerely, Q
Aaron J. Breesette, PE
Section Manager, Municipal Services
CC: Travis Hoover, PE, City Engineer
NOR [heinesdq, hc.