Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1968-01-16P'`inutes of ~'e~'.~1~. ~° :-eet__r._; of la nn ,"`j ~ 1') r'-e _'rnen OT' ::_t~r Of `vers-c'., issouri Jams ry lb, 1`'~P, r~ 1-_r n,ee~,in~ 7i' the r3osrd o:" f].eri-~er, oi' Cit~r ^-' - verside, Tli ^-Jlrl ~!1 :'1 ld in tt~P. v~ t'r i`~L1 'r 7, e1~S]_de, ,^Olzrl c;n J"?`=Uf'rq lh, e 1. <, tic`. ~ 7 .~.~ d ::men "7-. i,,n, ~ ~,, l' ~n7 , ic( ), `t 8:`~0 ,,. Y., and ~,~on n~_cl ~ _ Ti y, P:Y.; .tn^ht, ?]alt 'n '3 pt. t.O~nt' L'61'~' j~re^dnt, dl^rk~~ i;r.6nt~ 7nC _ "?Or ~ 1 '~F~ d^7_lin- slid ~~„cet?.n; to order. ?":irutes of re~ul<r .~eeti.n.,r;s oi' Decembe.r h, 1~;h7 a,nd J<nu r•y ~, 168, t~?Pre re^^ and ?cceptPd as rare!. Ct-~ester ~. ::oats presenter' r,lt;ns to build aryj 2c;d ~.tinn to the L''ve:~,sic„~ ?~<^~?i-.'st !:~urch and it tir^s aprroved ^nd "err?it 1-0. 68-g z.*as isst~.ed to the ~roj~>ct. It was reported that the owner of Hudson Service Station wanted to know if there was somethingthat could be done abut cutting off Highway 6~, as this would cut off all the businesses in that area, and were advised that it was paobablq toolate to d o anything in that regard. It was suggested that Mr. Dorsey break down his statement on each subject separately and not lump the amount, as w elwill have to make the breakdown when the sewers are but in, and it is necessary to have it broken down on each item for accounting purposes. This would also pertain to the Engineers statement when it is prepared. Mr. Myers brought up thematter of fixing the sewer charges, and that in Mr. ~orsey~s letter of January 16, 1968, that we need to have an electicn and approval of the charges to b e made by a Majority of the people. It was suggested that Mr. Dorsey write theMissouri Cities dater ~'ompany to see what their fee would be to collect the sewer bills, setting forth the Missouri Statutes where they are to collect same if the City desires, as set@'orth in Mr. Dorsey~s letter of Jan. 16, 1968. After this information is secured, then Mr. Dorsey can work with the council to set up the election to be held. Mr. Myers advised that Larkin and Associates were the serveyers who set up the plans for installing the sewer in Jumping branch and he contacted them so that he could get the plans and use them in establishing the grddes. Mr. Myers also advised that we will have to cross Line Creek as far east as w e can and set on the other side of the highwya. If we go in on the east side, weeill ha~.'e to ~o down themiddle of the blacktop driveway et the Bank, that is the only way we can stay clear of the Governments flood protectibn~:~,lan, but it will be cheaper than Nutting the sewer c0 to 30 feet deep. If we go alcn~ the highway with 8~ line, we can bore under the highway. Mr. Myers said he thought it was in order to go ahead with the ~~lans, however he tF~o ught it would be best to have the meeting of the people or lend owners and exp'hin to them how this project would be assessed against themand then after the meeting could go ahead with further ~~lans. It was also suggested bit Mr. Myers that hewould talk to thepeople in 7-Oaks addition about the putting in of the road if they had any questions to ask. He said they c<;uld come to the City hall. The first notice and second notice were scheduled to be published in the paper and that 10 days following the second notice was when anyone who wanted to protest could ent8ertheir protest. This would be February 20. It was also deceided that this Yage 2, - Minutes of peg. Meeting January 16, 1968 was a good time of the year within which to get the bids, as the road paving people are lining up the work for the coming spring and summer. Swetnam moved that rules be suspended and Bill No. 343-6 be placed cn its second reading, seccnded by Klamm, the roll was called and votes were as follows: Clark-abs nt; Klamm-aye; Layton-aye; 343-6 IS3sa~ea$a3s~s Shelton-aye; Swetnam-aye; Young-aye; and _Jgill No. was a ceordingly read. Laytoh moved that rules be suspended and Bi11 No. 343-6 be placed on its third reading and upon passage of same, become Ord. No. 3 43-6, seconded by Young, the roll was called and votes were as follows: Clark-absent; Klamm-aye; Shelton-aye; Layton-aye; Swetnam-aye; Young-aye; Bi11No. 343-6 was accordingly read, approved by Mayor rilger and became Ord. fin. 343-6• Swetnam moved that rules be suspended and b3~i.11 No. 343-? be placed on its second reading, seconded by Klamm, the roll was calla:? and votes were as follows: Clark-absent; Klamm-aye; Layton-sye; Shelton-aye; S~.~etnam-aye; Foung-aye; Bill No. 3 43-7 was acco~ dangly read. 5ayton moved that rules be suspended and Bill No. 343-~ b e placed on its third reading and upon passage of same b eccme Ord. No. 343-7, seconded by Young, the rollwas called and votes were as folloti•~s: Clark-absent; Layton-aye; Klamm-dye; Shelton-aye; Swetnam-aye Young-eye/ B11 No. 343-7 w as accordingly read, approve~3 by Mayor Filger and became Ord. No. 343-7• Swetnamm^ved that rules be suspended and Bill No. 343-8 b e placed on its second reading, seconded by Klamm, the rollwas called and votes were as follows: Clark-absent; Klamm-aye; Layotn-aye; Shelton-aye; Swetnamgaye~y Young-aye; Bill No. 343-8 was accordingly read, a~¢~¢aaaactxlt~x~f[~axx~t~ga~a Layton moved that rules b e suspended and Bill No. 3 43-8 be placed on its third reading and upon passage of same become Ord. No. 343-8, seconded by Young, the roll was called and votes were as follows: Clark-absent; Kamm-eye; Layton-aye; Shelton-aye; Swetnam-aye; Young- aye; Bill No. 343-8 was accordingly read, approved by Mayor Filger and became Ord. No. 343-8• Swe~nam moved that rules besuspended and Bill No. 343-4 be placed on its second reading, seconded by Klamm, the roll was called and votes were as f ollows~ Clark-absent; Klamma-aye; Layton-aye; Shelt-n-aye; Swetnam-sqe; Young-aye; Bill No.343-'% was accordingly read. Layotn moved that rules besuspended and Bill No. 343-9 b e placed on its third reading and upon passage of same b ecome Ord. No. 343-9, seccnded by Young, the sere roll was called and votes were as sd~llows: C]a^k-absent; Klamm-a e; Layotn-aye; Shelton-aye; Swetnam-aye; Young-eye; B~11 No. 3~3-9 was acce rdingly read, a proved by Mayor Filger and bedame Ord. No. 3 43-~. Page 3, Minutes of Reg. Meeting Ja nu ary 16, 1968 S*aetnammoved that rules be suspended and Bill No. 343-10 be placed on its ascend r eading, s econded by Klemm, the roll was c a11ed and votes were as follows: Clark-absent; Klemm-aye; Layton-aye; Shelt on- aqe; Swetnam-aye; Young-aye; Bill No. 343-10 was accordingly read. Layton moved that rules b e suspended and Bi11No.3 43-10 be placed on its third dreading and upon passage of same became Crd• No• 343-10, seconded by Young, the roll was called and votes sere as follows: Clark-absent; Klemm-aye; Layton-aye; Shelt n-aye; Swetnam-a e; Young-aqe; Bill No. 3 43-10 was accordingly read, a; proved by Mayor ~ilger and became Ord. No. 343-10. Swetnam moved that rules be suspended and dill No. 343-11, be placed oh its second reading, ,seconded by Klemm, the roll was called and votes were as follows: Clark-absent; Klemm-aye; Shelton-aye; Layttn-aye; Swetnma-aye; Young-aye; Bill No. 343-11 was accordingly read. It was suggested by the council that Mr. +~orsey draw up the ordinance necessary for us to have with regard to the sewer charges as he suggestedin his letter of Janu-~ y 16, 1968. Mr. Myers also brought up the subj$ct of Cullum and Brown, the party who wanted to put up a building to do sand blasting and that where they waited to put i# would be on the place where it is anticipated toput the levy. Klemm moved thab BillnNo. D-68-2 being bill providing for the ppropriation ofmoney out of the general fund of the City of Riverside, ~`iasouri for the payment of certain indebtedness a s $sted ther in bs placed on its first reading, seconded by Swetnam, the roll was called and votes were ~s follows: Clark-absent; Klemm-aye; Shelton-aye. Layton-aye; Swetnam-aye; Young-aye, Bill No. D-68-2 was accordingly read, Swetnammoved that rules b e suspended and Bill No. D-b8-2 be placed on its second reading, seconded by Sheltoni the roll was called and votes were as follows: Clark-a~rsent; Kla m~-aye; Layton-aye; Shelton-aye; Swetnam-aye; Yo~~ng-aye; Bill No. D-6_,-2 was accordingly read. Layton moved that rules b esuspended and Bi11 No. D-68-2 be placed on its third r~ ading and upon passage of same ti ecome Ord. No. D-68-2, seconded by Klemm, the roll was called and votes were as follows: Clark-absent; Layton-aye; Klemm-aye; Shelton-aye; Swetnam-aye; Yo~~ng-aye; Bill No. D-68-2 was accordingly read. Klemm moved meeting adjourn, no furlter business, meeting adjourned. w~ ti~ ~ ~~'~ ~~.~~ e W)`i w°