HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-01-02 TIF Commission ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 01-02
RESOLUTION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING COMMISSION OF
RIVERSIDE, MISSOURI ("COMMISSION") APPROVING THE INCLUSION OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT I-PHASE K WITHIN THE L-385 LEVEE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, AS AMENDED ("PLAN"); APPROVING THE
DESIGNATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT I-PHASE K AREA;
APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FOR THE
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT I-PHASE K AREA; AND EXPRESSING ITS
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF RIVERSIDE,
MISSOURI WITH RESPECT TO THE SAME
WHEREAS, the Commission was created pursuant to Ordinance No. 95-64, adopted by
the Board of Aldermen of Riverside, Missouri (the "Board of Aldermen") on September 12,
1995;
WHEREAS, the Real Property Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, Sections
99.800 to 99.865 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, as amended (the "Act"), requires the
Commission to: (a) hold hearings with respect to proposed redevelopment areas, redevelopment
plans and redevelopment projects; (b) vote on the approval of the same; and (c) make its
recommendations on the same to the Board of Aldermen;
WHEREAS, the Commission, by Resolution No. 96-06-O1, passed on June 27, 1996,
classified the Redevelopment Area (as defined in the Plan) as a "blighted area" and designated it
as a redevelopment area under the Act; approved the Plan, the Redevelopment Project I and the
Redevelopment Project I Area; adopted tax increment financing for the Redevelopment Project I
Area; and expressed its recommendation to the Board of Aldermen with respect to the same; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen, by Ordinance No. 96-72, passed on July 16, 1996,
classified the Redevelopment Area as a "blighted area" and designated it as a redevelopment area
under the Act; approved the Plan, the Redevelopment Project I and the Redevelopment Project I
Area; and adopted tax increment financing for the Redevelopment Project I Area; which
designation provides for the approval of individual projects on aproject-by-project basis; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen has approved subsequent amendments to the Plan
after recommendations by the Commission, including Redevelopment Project I-Phases A, B, C,
D, F, G, H, I and J;
WHEREAS, the Commission has received and reviewed a Tax Increment Financing
Application from Polsinelli Shalton & Welte regarding the construction of a telecommunications
tower (the "Redevelopment Project I-Phase K") within the Redevelopment Area, and on a tract
of property more particularly described on attached Exhibit A (the "Redevelopment Project I-
Phase KArea"). (A copy of the Application is attached as Exhibit B.)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tax Increment Financing
Commission of Riverside, Missouri;
The Commission has previously found that:
a. the existing conditions of the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K Area, as
described in Exhibit A, are a fair depiction of the Redevelopment Project I-Phase
K Area and cause the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K Area to be a "blighted
area" as defined in the Act;
b. the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K Area has not been subject to growth and
development through investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably
be anticipated to be developed without the adoption of the Plan;
c. the Plan, as amended, conforms to the comprehensive plan for development of the
City of Riverside, Missouri as a whole;
d. the estimated dates, which shall not be more than 23 years from the adoption of
the respective ordinances approving the Redevelopment Projects, of completion
of the Redevelopment Projects and retirement of obligations incurred to finance
redevelopment project costs have been stated in the Plan; and
e. there are currently no businesses or residences within the Redevelopment Project
I-Phase K Area which will be required to be relocated due to Phase K.
2. The Commission approves the designation of the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K Area
as a redevelopment project area under the Act.
3. The Commission has previously approved the Plan.
4. The Commission approves the inclusion of the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K within
the Plan and expects to adopt additional specific redevelopment project(s) and
redevelopment project area(s) within the Redevelopment Area on aproject-by-project
basis.
5. The Commission recommends to the Board of Aldermen that the Board of Aldermen pass
one or more ordinances:
a. Finding the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K Area to be blighted and designating
the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K Area as a redevelopment project area under
the Act.
b. Approving the inclusion of the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K within the Plan.
c. Approving tax increment financing for the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K Area
and providing that:
(i) after the total equalized assessed valuation of the taxable real property in
the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K Area exceeds the certified total
initial equalized assessed valuation of the- taxable real property in such
2
Redevelopment Project I-Phase K Area, the ad valorem taxes and
payments in lieu of taxes, if any, arising from the levies upon taxable real
property in such Redevelopment Project I-Phase K Area by taxing districts
and tax rates determined in the manner provided in subsection 2 of the
Section 99,855 of the Act each year after the effective date of this
ordinance until the Redevelopment Project Costs pursuant to the Plan have
been paid, shall be divided as follows:
(a) That portion of taxes levied upon each taxable lot, block, tract, or
parcel of real property which is attributable to the initial equalized
assessed value of each such taxable lot, block, tract, or parcel of
real property in the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K Area shall be
allocated to, and when collected shall be paid by the county
collector to, the respective affected taxing districts in the manner
required by law in the absence of the adoption of tax increment
allocation financing;
(b) Payments in lieu of taxes attributable to the increase in the current
equalized assessed valuation of each taxable lot, block, tract, or
parcel of real property in the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K
Area over and above the initial equalized assessed value of each
such unit of property in the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K Area
shall be allocated to, and when collected shall be paid to, the
municipal treasurer who shall deposit such payment in lieu of taxes
into a special fund called the "Special Allocation Fund" of the
municipality for the purpose of paying redevelopment costs and
obligations incurred in the payment thereof. Payments in lieu of
taxes which are due and owing shall constitute a lien against the
real estate of the redevelopment project from which they are
derived. The municipality may, in the ordinance, pledge the funds
in the special allocation fund for the payment of such costs and
obligations and provide for the collection of payments in lieu of
taxes, the lien of which may be foreclosed in the same manner as a
special assessment lien as provided in Section 88.861 RSMo. No
part of the current equalized assessed valuation of each lot, block,
tract, or parcel of property in the Redevelopment Project I-Phase K
Area attributable to any increase above the total initial equalized
assessed value of such properties shall be used in calculating the
general state school aid formula provided for in Section 163.031
RSMO., until such time as all redevelopment costs have been paid
as provided for in this section and Section 99.850.
(ii) in addition to the payments in lieu of taxes described in Section
99.845.1(2) of the Act, the total additional revenues from taxes generated
by economic activities in a Redevelopment Project Area, as described in
Section 99.845.3 of the Act, shall be allocated as set forth in Section
99.845.3 of the Act.
3
(iii) in addition to the payments in lieu of taxes described in Section
99.845.1(2) of the Act and the economic activity taxes described in
Section 99.845.3 of the Act, the total additional revenues from New State
Revenues generated within a Redevelopment Project Area as provided in
Section 99.845.4-.12 of the Act shall be allocated as set forth in Section
99.845.4-.12 of the Act.
Passed this 27`~ day of June, 2001.
i- ~ ~ r ~
rman
ATTEST:
~ . (~
J ~~_ ~ '~: I ~~ ~ ~. ~~
Secretary
4
APPLICATION RELATED TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCITIG FOR
THE L-385 LEVEE PRO,)ECT
APPLICA.'JT: Polsinelli Shalton & t4elte / Donna Wilscr.
ADDRESS: 700 w, 47th, Ste. 1000, RCMO 64112
816/753-1000
PHONE #:
FAX#: 816/753-153F,
CONTACT PERSON: Donna M. Wilson
Please atuwe: the following questions (if additional space is needed, please attached information):
(1) Desenbc the proposed project, includingg its nature, size; sco a and phasing(including projected
completion date): Proposed felecommunica~ion tower
(2) Identify the owner of the real estate upon. which the proposed project would be constructed:
KPP&L ; 1330 Baltimore, Kansas City, MO 64151
(3) Dc~-t~c the boundaries of such real estate by address: Site Address : 4101 N,w,
Tu ison Road Attach a map/skebch of the
area and a legal description of the property.
(4) provide the Platte County Tax Parcel Number for the property: ~ ~ _ z n _ n ~ _ n n n-_,nn~ _
035-000
(S} Provide estimated cost of the proposed project (real property-buildings, improvemetm, etc_
portion only-not personal property): •.
(~ Will the proposed project generate retailSales? no . If yes, provide estimate of annual
retail sales subject to sales tax: `.
~- (~ Will portions of the proposed project be leased? If yes, please identify all
tenants: _ -
(8) Provide the number of current full-time employees 0 and part-time employees
0 employed oa the development site prior to this project and as estimate of the
number of additional full-time employees 0 and part-time employees
0 ~ due to the proposed project.
*If proposed project is an addition to a cturently existing facility, please provide information
relating to the new addition only.
=0DlU1 WORlDOXU:KZrF7dTSi 149310000t1L1ttI1FAP-
RF Report
KC 13XC298
Candidate sites reviewed by Sprint PCS RF department:
Candidate:
(A) Park Hill South High School RooBop
(B) Park Hill South High School
(C) Damon Purcell Construction
(D) Brown/River Ciry Holding Co.
(E) KCP&L Riverside Substation -'~
All other altemative sites in the area have been evaluated as possible candidate sites. This
memo outlines briefly the main reasons, from RF perspectives, for choosing the site
currently being proposed.
None of the following sites listed as alternative candidate sites have been found to be
suitable in meeting all of the requirements demanded of the site KC13XC298E for the
following reasons.
• Location (A and B) is located on top of Park Hill High School. Elevation of this
candidate is too high. This will cause unnecessary overlap of RF in surrounding area
to the north.
• Location (C) is located too far from the I-635/highway 9 intersection. A site in this
area result would not meet the coverage or capacity objectives. One of our objectives
is to increase coverage along I-635 and highway 9. This site will be too far north and
west to meet these needs. ~'
• Location (D and E) will meet the needs for RF. Candidate D would be •in a good
location site but is not as good as candidate E. RF is looking to put the site as close to
the intersection of I-635 and highway 9. Currently there is a "hole" in coverage _
around this area. Candidate E will improve coverage and off-load capacity from
surrounding Sprint PCS sites.
Candidates for site KC13XC298
STH
a
q .~,
~~.((dr
~J,
2 F' ~ ~~
i~l: ~,•
Z v =
rte'
~,-~
l _
`~ ~ i y ` ~
/~
~y
-- s
c
~z
ur
r~
..... ~ n G
A?PLiCA':TON POR S?ECZAL USE PERMi^
SUDnIT IN TRZ?L:LATE
NAHE: Polsinelli.Shalton & Welte, ATTN: Donna M. Wilson
JIDDRESS:700 W. 47th STreet, Suite 1000, Kansas City, Missouri 64112
PHONE NUHBER: 816/753-1000
Application is hereby made to Riverside Planning [ommission for a spec:~:
use permit -
1) Location: 4101 NW Tullison Road, Riverside, Missouri 64150
Z) Owner(s) of the Iand: K.C. Power and Light
3) Zening District, in which it is located: Industrial
4) Accurate description of the Iand:
See attached legal description
5) The proposed use (both as to function and opcration, and as
any structures, installations, equipment or surface improveme-:-
or change incident to such uSe):
Telecommunication Tower
6) Names and addresses cf all owners o£ land adjoinin? that f~:
which such permit is sought:
See Attached List
7) The period o: time of the term of such use after date of perm::,
=~- if applicable: 25 Years
8) Special conditions as to operation, site development, signs, a-c
other pertinent descriptive factors: There will be two
eay;nmPn+ cabinets in addi inn to the tower
2
9)
10)
12)
XX
Ful'_ statement of the environmental effects of such use wits
respect to adjoining property, in the zoning district in wh.ic::
the same should be located:
Proposed tower will have n
other statements recuested by zoning Enforcement Person:
See attached
Zf a special use permit is- requested
have specific requirements set forth
completed? y~$ XX NO
for the following uses,
in the Zoning Code bee::
Ex~'air.: Inventory of e:cistinq towers within one-quarter mile
a) Airports and E:eliports
b) Drive-in Theaters
c) Mobile home Parks
d) Installation of Antenna Facilities
e) Outdoor Reczeational Facilities
f) Sand Pits, Gravel Pits, Rock Quarries, Hinerals anc
Excavation Operations for a Period not to Exceed Ffve (:;
Years. -
g) Public Swimming Clubs or Pools
h) Townhouses
i) Underground Storace
j) Used Motor vehicles,- Regulations for Selling Used Motor
Vehicles
~,aelication must be accomnanied,b : ,
XX a Site deve opment plan.
XX b) A statement in 'writing by the Applicant and adequate
evidence showing the proposed special use permit will
conform to the standards set forth in these regulations.
XX c) Esact legal description of area for which the special use
permit request is made (Please Attach).
ZaundQrstand that a special use permit may be terminated by the City at
any time with or without cause irrespective of a termination date
otherwise specified.
Applicant agrees to remove the special use as of the termination date
unless specific renewal or extension thereof is granted.
3
All Special Use Permits shall be reviewed annually by the 8aatd
Aldermen.
The tee (~150.00)-is attached to this application. CASH ,_ CHECK /~
other fees required by Planning Commission
I HEREBY CERTFFY THAT I NAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND R~:~
PRESENT ECZTY OR INANCES OF THE CITY OF VRZVERSIDEND MISSOURI LAND AGREE T.^
ASIDE 8Y ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE ORDINANCES OF SAID CITY WHETHER SPECZF:S=
HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF-A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO C:'/:
AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LCC.;:,
LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFOR~M~,A"NCE OF CONSTRQCTIO/N,.
DATE: it vvy" ~ ~, ~LI,C~.~~
AF~Siicant's Signature '
IF A CORPORATZON~ THE PRESIDENT HOST SiCN WITH A SEAL OF CORPORATION A`~~
ATTESTATSON BY THE SECRETARY OP THE CORPORATION.
Corporation Name
By:
?resident
ATTEST:
Secreta[y
ZONING ENFORCEMENT PERSON
APPROVAL Date
DISAPPROVAL" 0 ~ ~
zoning Enforcement Person's Comments
.:'Date forwarded to Planning Commission
. L ~ ~~
Zon n rcement Pezs n's Signature
4
PLANNING CON.MISSION--------- -------------__--
STANDARDS FOR REVIE'r1:NG S2ECiAL USc 2ERMZTS:
No special use permit shall be granted unless the special use (place •:<•
in front o£ the:.e ite^,s the applicant has proven to be correct);
(a) Zs deemed necessary for the puh_'ic convenience at tea:
location; and
(b) Is so designed, located, and- pcooosed to be operated tha_
the public health, safety, and welfare will be protected;
end
(c) That the access road^ ut'7't'
(d)
(e)
(f)
(9)
(h)
~. i_i ies, drainage, and/c:
necessary facilities will be adequate to facilitate t~~
needs of the special use; and ;
that the size of the site in relationship to the use a-d
the '_ccation of the site with resaect to existine or fut~:e
streets giving access to i*_, along with the walls and
fences will not discourage the appropriate development ant
use of adjacent land, uses, structures, and building; and
That such special use shall not be inconsistent c:
adversely affect the regular permitted uses in the District
in which the same is located; and
That it shall not adversely of £ect, or reduce propert;~
values of land and prcperties surrounding the same, whether
or not immediately adjoining, when devoted to permitte~
uses; and
Thae is shall be in compliance with the height, area, arc
of-her applicable regulations of the District in which the
same is located, except a~ otherwise specifically provided
in the permit; and
Operations in connection with any special u:.e permit shall
not be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason o:
noise, fumes, vibration or lights than would be [he
operations of any 'use permitted by right.
APPROVAL
DENIAL
Planning Commission's Comments
Date
Hemmer of Planning"" C mml ion s Signature
------------------------------------ -----------------------------------
S
HARD OF ALDERMEDJ
APPROVAL
DENTAL
Date
APPROXIMATE DATE OF ANNUAL REVIEW
Nemoet of Boa:d,of Aldermen s Signature
ANY FURTHER ACTION? (PledSe Explain) --"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PERHIT NUMBER
--------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
YEAR 1 R'cVIE'A
1. Approximate date for review:
2. Date Reviewed:
3. Action Taken:
4. Comments:
Y.ember o Board o£ Aldermen's Signature
YEAR Z AEVZE~•1
1. Approximate date for..revie_w:
z. Date Reviewed:
3. Action Taken• "--
4. Comments:
Cember of Board of Aldermen's Signature
------------------------------------------------------- -------------------
YEAR 3 REVIEW
1. Approximate date for review:
2. Date Reviewed:
3. Action Taken:
4. Comments:
Hember of Board .of Aldermen's Signature
------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- -
YEAR ~ REVIE'.~J
1. Approximate date Ear review:
2. Date Reviewed:
3, Action Taken:
4. Comments:
Hember of. Board of Aldermen's Signature
------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
YEAR S REVIE:J
I. Approximate date for review:
2. Date Reviewed:
3. Action Taken:
4_ Comments:
1:embet of Board of Aldermen's Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------
reAR 6 REViEw
1. Approximate date fcr review:
~. gate Reviewed:
3. Action Taken:
4. Comments:
Hemoer o Boar of Aldermen's Signature
YEAR 7 R°VIEW
I. Approximate date for review:
2. Date Reviewed:
3. Action Taken:
4. Comments:•
hember aE Board of Aldermen's Signature
YEAR 8 REVIEW
1. Approximate date for review:
1.' Date Reviewed:
3. Action Taken:
4. Comments:
Member of Board o A.dermen s Signature
YEAR 9 REVIEW
1. Approximate date for review:
~. Date Reviewed;
3. Action Taken:
4. Camments:
Member of Board of Aldermen's Signature
_AR 10 REVIEW
1. Approximate date for review:
2. Ddte Reviewed: -
3. Action Taken:
4. Comments:
Member of Board of Aldermen s Signature
~,e~al Description /Parent Parcel
A part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 4, Township 50 East,. Range 33, West, of the
Fifth Principal Meridian, Platte County, Missouri.
Proposed Telecommunication Tower at 4101 NW Tullison Road.
1. The proposed tower will provide coverage to users in the surrounding area. Adequate
coverage does not currently exist in this area. By providing better coverage, the
proposed tower is necessary for the public's convenience.
2. The proposed tower will not present any harm to the public health, safety or welfare.
3. The site will be accessed by an 80' + drive and additional utilities are provided on the
site to facilitate the needs of the proposed tower.
4. The proposed tower will be located on the property of the existing KCP&L
Substation and will not discourage development and use of adjacent land, uses,
structures, or buildings.
5. The proposed tower is consistent with other light industrial uses.
6. The proposed tower will have no impact on property values.
7. The proposed tower is in compliance with all regulations of the Industrial zoning
district.
:0150/48538
CDPUL 146-i87